On Nov 8, 9:50 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
Kate,
>
> Much thanks for the link to Josh's update of cvxopt.spkg.
No problem.
>
> With that fix, I now can compile on all the architectures
> I am currently interested in: x86-Linux, x86_64-Linux, and ia64-Linux.
>
> The next step is to run 'make check', which I have done.
>
> Sadly, only x86-Linux passes all the tests.
>
> ***
> x86_64-Linux
> ***
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/real_rqdf.pyx
> **********************************************************************
> File "real_rqdf.pyx", line 12:
> sage: RQDF( 123.2) + RR (1.0)
> Expected:
> 124.200000000000
> Got:
> NaN
> **********************************************************************
> File "real_rqdf.pyx", line 14:
> sage: RQDF( 12.2) + RDF (0.56)
> Expected:
> 12.76
> Got:
> nan
> **********************************************************************
> File "real_rqdf.pyx", line 16:
> sage: RQDF( 12.2) + (9)
> Expected:
> 21.19999999999999928945726423989981412887573242187500000000000000
> Got:
> NaN
> **********************************************************************
>
> and then others with a similar message: Got NaN or Got nan
mmmh, any chance some other package pulls in the libmpfr that caused
trouble with libfplll? Could you gzip the build log and post it
somewhere and send us a link?
>
> ***
> ia64-Linux
> ***
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/
> polynomial_element.pyx
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py
> **********************************************************************
> File "lcalc.py", line 188:
> sage: E.Lseries().values_along_line(0.5, 3, 5)
> Expected:
> lcalc: 1.5 0 WARNING- we don't have enough Dirichlet
> coefficients.
> lcalc: Will use the maximum possible, though the output will not
> necessarily be accurate.
> lcalc: nan nan
> [(0, 0.209951303),
> (0.500000000, -2...e-16),
> (1.00000000, 0.133768433),
> (2.00000000, 0.552975867)]
> Got:
> lcalc: 1.5 0 WARNING- we don't have enough Dirichlet
> coefficients.
> lcalc: Will use the maximum possible, though the output will not
> necessarily be accurate.
> lcalc: nan nan
> [(0, 0.209951303), (0.500000000, -3.16949699e-16), (1.00000000,
> 0.133768433), (2.00000000, 0.552975867)]
> **********************************************************************
>
Mhh, not sure about this one yet.
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
> **********************************************************************
> File "test.py", line 4:
> : from cvxopt.base import *
> Exception raised:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/kate/sage/sage-2.8.12-ia64-Linux/local/lib/python2.5/
> doctest.py", line 1212, in __run
> compileflags, 1) in test.globs
> File "<doctest __main__.example_0[0]>", line 1, in <module>
> from cvxopt.base import *###line 4:
> : from cvxopt.base import *
> ImportError: /usr/lib/libblas.so.3: undefined symbol: e_wsfe
> **********************************************************************
>
Josh - any idea about this one?
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/
> polynomial_element.pyx**********************************************************************
> File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 2314:
> sage: f.roots(ring=CC)
> Expected:
> [(1.00000000000000, 1), (-0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784438*I,
> 1), (-0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784438*I, 1)]
> Got:
> [(1.00000000000000, 1), (-0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784439*I,
> 1), (-0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784439*I, 1)]
> **********************************************************************
> File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 2749:
> sage: (x^3 - 1).complex_roots()
> Expected:
> [1.00000000000000, -0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784438*I,
> -0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784438*I]
> Got:
> [1.00000000000000, -0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784439*I,
> -0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784439*I]
> **********************************************************************
>
Ok, these are only minor precision issues, that we can easily fix in
the next release.
> Kate
Any volunteers to open trac tickets for these? I have to leave for the
airport in 5 hours and would like to catch some sleep. I am also
working on another release candidate for ApCoCoA - Grrrr, work sucks.
<SNIP>
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
