Michael,
Much thanks for the link to Josh's update of cvxopt.spkg.
With that fix, I now can compile on all the architectures
I am currently interested in: x86-Linux, x86_64-Linux, and ia64-Linux.
The next step is to run 'make check', which I have done.
Sadly, only x86-Linux passes all the tests.
***
x86_64-Linux
***
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/real_rqdf.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "real_rqdf.pyx", line 12:
sage: RQDF( 123.2) + RR (1.0)
Expected:
124.200000000000
Got:
NaN
**********************************************************************
File "real_rqdf.pyx", line 14:
sage: RQDF( 12.2) + RDF (0.56)
Expected:
12.76
Got:
nan
**********************************************************************
File "real_rqdf.pyx", line 16:
sage: RQDF( 12.2) + (9)
Expected:
21.19999999999999928945726423989981412887573242187500000000000000
Got:
NaN
**********************************************************************
and then others with a similar message: Got NaN or Got nan
***
ia64-Linux
***
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/
polynomial_element.pyx
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py
**********************************************************************
File "lcalc.py", line 188:
sage: E.Lseries().values_along_line(0.5, 3, 5)
Expected:
lcalc: 1.5 0 WARNING- we don't have enough Dirichlet
coefficients.
lcalc: Will use the maximum possible, though the output will not
necessarily be accurate.
lcalc: nan nan
[(0, 0.209951303),
(0.500000000, -2...e-16),
(1.00000000, 0.133768433),
(2.00000000, 0.552975867)]
Got:
lcalc: 1.5 0 WARNING- we don't have enough Dirichlet
coefficients.
lcalc: Will use the maximum possible, though the output will not
necessarily be accurate.
lcalc: nan nan
[(0, 0.209951303), (0.500000000, -3.16949699e-16), (1.00000000,
0.133768433), (2.00000000, 0.552975867)]
**********************************************************************
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
**********************************************************************
File "test.py", line 4:
: from cvxopt.base import *
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/kate/sage/sage-2.8.12-ia64-Linux/local/lib/python2.5/
doctest.py", line 1212, in __run
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_0[0]>", line 1, in <module>
from cvxopt.base import *###line 4:
: from cvxopt.base import *
ImportError: /usr/lib/libblas.so.3: undefined symbol: e_wsfe
**********************************************************************
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/
polynomial_element.pyx**********************************************************************
File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 2314:
sage: f.roots(ring=CC)
Expected:
[(1.00000000000000, 1), (-0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784438*I,
1), (-0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784438*I, 1)]
Got:
[(1.00000000000000, 1), (-0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784439*I,
1), (-0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784439*I, 1)]
**********************************************************************
File "polynomial_element.pyx", line 2749:
sage: (x^3 - 1).complex_roots()
Expected:
[1.00000000000000, -0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784438*I,
-0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784438*I]
Got:
[1.00000000000000, -0.500000000000000 + 0.866025403784439*I,
-0.500000000000000 - 0.866025403784439*I]
**********************************************************************
Kate
On Nov 8, 10:04 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 3:59 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Michael,
>
> Hello Kate,
>
>
>
> > I have tried
>
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/libfplll-2.1-20071024.p...
>
> > and can report that it builds on my x86_64-Linux box.
>
> Great. I will make sure the updated spkg goes into 2.9 or whatever the
> next release will be.
>
> > The build is
> > now
> > stuck at the cvxopt-0.8.2.p4 spot (same error) that I reported for
> > x86-Linux and ia64-Linux.
>
> Josh did update the cvxopt.spkg (see above in the thread). The latest
> is at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jkantor/spkgs/cvxopt-0.8.2.p5.spkg
>
> It should now handle gfortran and g95 without problems. Please report
> back if that solves your problem.
>
> > Kate
>
> <SNIP>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
