On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: > > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) > > Because then you can > > use the syntax: > > > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) > > > > for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue. > > When I commended Sage's syntax I was assuming you were using this > Mathematica like syntax already. I agree with Ondrej and think his > suggestion above is the way to go.
So do I. I think we should change that functions as suggested. Anybody want to submit a patch? Ondrej, could you create a trac ticket making precise what you want, etc.? > Well Mathematica is proprietary software so I'm not sure why this would be > interesting. More important it seems to me is to make a rock solid wrapper > for > Maxima's engine. Fortunately, that's already done :-) -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
