On Nov 20, 2007 11:44 PM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > >  Because then you can
> > > use the syntax:
> > >
> > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi))
> > >
> > > for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue.
> >
> > When I commended Sage's syntax I was assuming you were using this
> > Mathematica like syntax already.  I agree with Ondrej and think his
> > suggestion above is the way to go.
>
> This probably goes without saying, but presumably after the change one
> will still be able to use the syntax 'integrate(sin(x),x) ' for
> indefinite integration?  That is, the second argument may be a triple
> or a symbol?

Exactly as you say.

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to