Hi anybody, > it might be true that more users care about R but what if a minority really > really pushes for PolyBoRi? ;-) > > In any case, I am BCC'ing this to Michael and Andreas maybe they have some > wisdom to share how to cut the compile time of PolyBoRi. Hm, is this really a problem? From my experience while testing Burcin's latest spkg and his wrapper the final sage -ba needs much more time than the compilation of PolyBoRi. (Moreover, PolyBoRi's compilation time was completely irrelevant.) Of course, one could double-check, whether something is built, which is not needed. Also something like "scons -j 5" works very smoothly.
Best regards, Alexander --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
