On Dec 21, 3:46 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:27 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Friday 21 December 2007 08:42, David Harvey wrote:
> >> I've said it before and I'll say it again: if someone can make
> >> working on windows as easy and legal for me as "ssh sage.math", then
> >> I would probably be able to find some time to help out. If this can
> >> be made to happen then I think you will find more people interested
> >> in working on the port.
>
> > The irony is that both "easy" and "legal" are not so trivially
> > attainable with
> > *remote* use of windows. For instance, the cygwin ssh service on
> > windows
>
> [...]
>
> So you mean, the only way to do it is that someone buys some big
> license from Microsoft which allows multi-user remote access? Pricing
> is (number of users) * (price per license)?
I you buy a server license you get 5 client access licenses thrown in
"for free". But I think that local development is probably the best
way to do it, at least I will chose that route. The idea for a central
development server is mostly so that other people without the
knowledge how to set up the tool chain can join in and learn. It would
also increase the bus factor on the Windows port.
> david
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
