On Friday 21 December 2007 09:46, David Harvey wrote: > On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:27 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote: > > On Friday 21 December 2007 08:42, David Harvey wrote: > >> I've said it before and I'll say it again: if someone can make > >> working on windows as easy and legal for me as "ssh sage.math", then > >> I would probably be able to find some time to help out. If this can > >> be made to happen then I think you will find more people interested > >> in working on the port. > > > > The irony is that both "easy" and "legal" are not so trivially > > attainable with > > *remote* use of windows. For instance, the cygwin ssh service on > > windows > > [...] > > So you mean, the only way to do it is that someone buys some big > license from Microsoft which allows multi-user remote access? Pricing > is (number of users) * (price per license)?
That is my impression -- I don't know if the price per user can be less than price per license for local install. All of my past MS licensing experience has implied per user fees. Although some windows OS licenses are per-computer, but there have always been (in my experience) clauses closing the loop-holes for lots of thin clients. -- Joel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
