According to 

https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30406#comment:15

trac continues to be running after migration to keep links to trac alive.

Then do we really need to migrate (copy) tickets to github once and for 
all? I guess that the migrated tickets would be full of broken links 
internal or external. No?

Instead of having broken copies, why don't we keep the old tickets in trac, 
and start only new tickets fresh in github. The release manager would just 
declare to accept only PRs from github and reject branches of tickets from 
trac. Then people would just start to make new tickets in github mirroring 
tickets in trac. Gradually  github will replace trac in all development 
activities, without broken links. No? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/e3c966c0-c65a-4b91-8133-a5e66340a26bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to