On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 7:57:53 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 06:34:25AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > I am voting NO. > > I. This proposed policy change does not solve any problem. There are no > problems whatsoever with how we have managed the support of Python versions > since 2020 (when it became possible to use system Python instead of only > the Python from our SPKG.) this is not true. It solves a range of problems, e.g., in no particular order:
I'll be replying to one these at a time... > d) In contrast, our uses of NumPy/SciPy in the Sage library are very basic > and dating back by about a decade; No, not true. E.g. schemes/riemann_surfaces/riemann_surface.py is neither "basic" nor dating back that much - it's also under relatively active development, see its header: - Alexandre Zotine, Nils Bruin (2017-06-10): initial version - Nils Bruin, Jeroen Sijsling (2018-01-05): algebraization, isomorphisms - Linden Disney-Hogg, Nils Bruin (2021-06-23): efficient integration - Linden Disney-Hogg, Nils Bruin (2022-09-07): Abel-Jacobi map It's using Voronoi diagrams from scipy. Well, scipy.spatial.Voronoi was added in SciPy 0.12.0 (https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.spatial.Voronoi.html), released pretty much exactly a decade ago -- https://pypi.org/project/scipy/#history Next? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/baead8c6-65d2-4799-92c9-3e6c14ad5a62n%40googlegroups.com.
