This could make it harder for Timothy Abbott to create debian versions.
Based on some posted to debian-science, it appears that certain
debian maintainers have a negative view of the GNU FDL, which some
documentation is licensed under. Pushing FDL docs into a GPL's package
might make the entire thing "non-free". I know this sounds idiotic, and
maybe I'm wrong. But if I'm right this idea of combining these things
could generate some extra work on Tim Abbott's end.

I hope I'm just plain wrong. If I'm wrong, +1, but -1 (for the FDL
docs) if I'm right.


On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:47 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> What do you think of (optionally) adding a doc/ subdirectory to each spkg?
> When the spkg, say foo-1.2.3.spkg is installed, the directory
>
>    SAGE_ROOT/doc/packages/foo
>
> would be a copy of that doc/ subdirectory.
>
> That's it.
>
> The idea is that this would be very helpful for people on airplanes,
> etc., without
> internet access, who really want to browse say the GMP docs or the Python
> docs, but can't because they don't have internet access or the
> tools to build the docs from source.     Typically doc/ would contain html 
> only
> or maybe html and pdf versions of *built* docs, hence adding no dependency
> for building Sage.
>
> This would also provide an iterative way of getting rid of the
> out of date extra_docs spkg from early 2007, which nobody
> wants to update.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> To make this happen: (1) people have to think it is a good idea, and (2) a few
> lines of code need to be added to local/bin/sage-spkg
>
>  -- William
>
> --
> William Stein
> Associate Professor of Mathematics
> University of Washington
> http://wstein.org
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to