On Feb 9, 1:43 pm, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> > * fix the "trivial" issues Tim reported a while back, i.e. #3686-
> > #3690
> > * fix the non-owner ought to be able to doctest issues, i.e. #5155 so
> > that users can run the regression suite of Sage without owning any of
> > the Sage tree
>
> and:
>
> * get rid of maxima for basic calculus
Well, that won't be happening in the next 10 days or so until Sage 3.4
until you are willing to share the time machine you might have been
hiding from me :)
Burcin did fix a number of issues with pynac in 3.3, so hopefully we
will see the switchover to the new code there soon. But for now
integration and limits will remain in the hands for Maxima until
someone puts some serious effort into this. And it won't be an extra
10 days to get to the level we will require here.
> Ondrej
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
