Dear Carl,> How about s.size()? > > I don't particularly like s.card(), because the abbreviation is too > opaque -- it would be nice if somebody seeing the method for the first > time has a good chance of guessing what it means. Sure ! That was my first motivation for asking widely this question... By the way I found no standard sage representation for the most basic set in combinatoric, ie the sets of natural numbers ! Didn't I look at the right place ? Cheers, Florent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
