On Feb 26, 3:39 pm, Craig Citro <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I don't particularly like s.card(), because the abbreviation is too
> >> opaque --
>
> > Ah, is it? Hmm, well, maybe. Short poll: who finds card opaque?
>
> I think it's pretty opaque. If I was looking for something like size
> already, I might think card is short for cardinality ... but if I was
> just looking through a list of methods, I don't think I'd guess that
> one right off.
Yes, let's not do "card" - we have tab completion for crying out loud
and that allows us to use long and descriptive names unlike some other
systems out there where I have a hard time wrapping my name around
naming conventions. No need to name names :)
> -cc
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
