CVXOPT 1.1 is much improved compared to version 0.9, so it would be great if you updated the version shipped with SAGE.
Joachim On Aug 13, 11:01 pm, David Joyner <[email protected]> wrote: > Of course, you should ask William before doing anything. > > Also, I'm not sure how cvxopt interacts with Sage. If only > via pexpect, I think you can distribute such GPLv2 and GPLv3 > software together but I'd have to check the FSF FAQ again to > be sure. > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:50 PM, David Joyner<[email protected]> wrote: > > You're right. > > > I think sage-2.7.2 had a cvxopt-0.8.2.spkg which might have been GPLv2+, > > but I can't find it using google. It has been removed from the cvxopt > > website. > > > I wonder if we should just upgrade to 1.1.1 and change the part in > > SAGE_ROOT/COPYING.txt which says > > "Every component of Sage except jsmath is licensed under a GPL v2 (or > > later) compatible license." ? > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Minh Nguyen<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi David, > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:40 AM, David Joyner<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> This is my understanding: the (old) version of cvxopt which we use in > >>> Sage is GPLv2+. The current version is 1.1.1, which is GPLV3+. > >>> Is that incorrect? > > >> The current version we're shipping is cvxopt cvxopt-0.9 which is > >> licensed under GPLv3+. That is what it says in the file LICENSE of > >> that spkg, i.e. cvxopt-0.9.p8.spkg. > > >> -- > >> Regards > >> Minh Van Nguyen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
