Ticket #6439 suggests that if code has Sage: ...
in an EXAMPLES block, then it should be flagged as an error, because presumably the author intended it to say sage: ... and with "Sage: ..." the example isn't actually doctested. I vote against this change: I don't see a reason why we should try to detect this typo more than anything else. (Or if we want to make this change, should we also flag "sgae:", for instance?) Note that with "sage -t -verbose ..." you can see exactly which tests are being run. Referees should also be on the lookout for any typos, including ones like this. So I would like the ticket to be closed without fixing it, but I think this deserves some discussion. Votes for closing without fixing? I say +1. John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
