On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Minh Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:24 AM, John H Palmieri <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Ticket #6439 suggests that if code has >> >> Sage: ... >> >> in an EXAMPLES block, then it should be flagged as an error, because >> presumably the author intended it to say >> >> sage: ... >> >> and with "Sage: ..." the example isn't actually doctested. > > When writing doctests, do people actually type in "sage:", "Sage:", > "SAGE:" or other variations rather than copying it from the Sage > command line? I would usually load the command line, type in the > doctesting code, and copy the input and output into the relevant > docstring. This is a simple use case, but any typo input at the > command line would result in Sage complaining. I find that a good way > to catch typos early before submiting patches. >
I use the notebook to make a little session, then click on "Text" in the upper right, which in most cases formats the output to make it suitable for doctesting. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
