A few comments based on having thought carefully about this for a few
years now.

1.  The preamble of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) from the
Free Software Foundation (home of the GPL) says:

"The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other
functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to
assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it,
with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially.
Secondarily, this License preserves for the author and publisher a way
to get credit for their work, while not being considered responsible
for modifications made by others."

It would be shocking if this was somehow incompatible with GPL'ed
software.  I view a mathematics textbook, including Sage code, to very
much be documentation for Sage in a very real sense - how to use Sage
to learn and do mathematics, and vice versa.  And I think the spirit
of this license is consistent with the open philosophy embraced by
Sage.

2.  The GFDL is extremely explicit about what you can, and cannot do,
and especially is clear about "Opaque" copies (think PDF) and
"Transparent" copies (think LaTeX-as-ASCII files).  The GFDL allows
you to make sections as "invariant", which I have used on Prefaces,
but some then consider the usage to not be truly open.  I no longer
use invariant sections, so you can modify my Preface if you
choose.  ;-)
http://linear.ups.edu/preface-2.00.pdf

3.  In contrast, the various CC licenses are quite short, I believe in
an attempt to be understandable.

4.  Many textbook authors use the CC NonCommercial (NC) clause on
their books.  My guess is that they do not want to see a traditional
publisher profit from their work.  However, if an open text can be
placed on a print-on-demand site (like Lulu.com, or Amazon's
CreateSpace, or others), in some cases then sold at production cost,
one can always undercut a traditional publisher with a quality
physical product.  Any increase in price needs to be accompanied by
some extra value (better manufacturing, distribution, availability).
If I could wave a magic wand, I'd ban CC-NC on all textbooks.  ;-)

5.  My linear algebra textbook runs to about 900 pages (embarrassing
yes, but it has everything a student would want, including full
solutions to many problems).  PDFs are about 7 MB, but the jsMath
version compresses to 695K, so if distributed as compressed worksheets
we should be able to achieve similar sizes.

6.  I build graphics from source, as part of a commitment to make the
*whole* book open source.  I was using PyX, which now appears to be a
dead project, and will this spring shift to something like Asymptote
or MetaPost.  As it is, the diagrams produced by PyX are PDFs at about
6K each, so the sizes of graphics can be mitigated as well in some
ways.

7.  As noted, CC does not require source, perhaps because some media
(music, video, photos) don't have such a thing.  Would we distibute
Sage just as binaries?

<opinion>
I have used CC on various things I have written, like an essay for
EDUCAUSE about open textbooks and video of presentations.  It stikes
me as appropriate for something like the Sage wiki.  However, I don't
think I would ever use it on a large project, like a textbook I have
spent several years on.  It just stikes me as too loose about the
responsibilities placed on the next person to modify or distribute
your work.  In contrast the GFDL is very explicit, and like the GPL,
places certain (reasonable) conditions on anyone who both modifies and
distributes your work, while giving everyone the right to use (read,
copy) your work, and to distribute it unmodified.

My hope for Sage is that we find it possible to eventually include a
reasonable selection of quality (ie reviewed, vetted) textbooks that
mesh nicely with Sage itself, and that we encourage licenses that are
in the best interests of both authors, teachers and readers.
</opinion>

Thanks for everybody's contributions to this thread.  It does seem to
take a while to wrap your head around the idea of a world where
publishing houses are not the only players in the academic textbook
market.

Rob

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to