> On 08/ 3/10 12:30 PM, François Bissey wrote: > At the minute I think we need an agreement of the overall plan of how we > define supported systems. I don't personally think either of the following > are sensible > > * Saying we support a whole distribution like "Debian". > * Saying we support the latest release of say Ubunta, when we don't > necessarily test on the latest release. We should state the version we > test on. > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/suggested-for-supported-platforms > > I proposed having 4 classes of supported system: > > # Fully supported > # Expected to work > # Probably will not work, but porting is ongoing > # Will not work, and porting will require substantial effort > > Your gentoo would go into the "Expected to work" since we can reasonably > expect Sage would work, but nobody is checking *every* release builds on > gentoo *prior* to releasing. >
That's where I was suggesting it would go. We certainly try to solve bugs Gentoo side or report in trac. > As a matter of interest, what version do you build on? What versions of > Gentoo could you expect Sage to work on? > Moot question. This is a rolling distro. Updated in the last month should be just fine. Francois -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org