Yeah that's true, and I wouldn't make the final decision on that, but it would be great if it could be tested anyway, I think this may make porting to 1.5.1 easier when it finally will be released,
On 29 Sep., 18:49, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 29, 11:46 am, maldun <dom...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > Maldun, do you think that would be possible? I'd be willing to retest > > > it on the OS X PPC box to make sure that didn't break anything - no, > > > Dima, I still don't have the Linux up on that yet :( > > > > - kcrisman > > > Sure why not! I give it a shot and post a patched version on trac as > > soon as possible. > > > I've already working on 1.5.0 too, and I think I know already what has > > to be fixed. > > If I provide the package of 1.5.0 and a patch for the doctests would > > you test, that too? > > Peraps we could jump directly to 1.5.0. then! > > But I thought the reason for doing 1.4.x was because it was more > stable? > > - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
