On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2010-11-03 08:57, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> Even easier, combine sage-scripts, extcode, and examples into the main >> Sage repository. That could simplify things a lot and lead to (IMHO) >> more and better development and accessibility of those other >> components. > >> I still have yet to see any compelling arguments for why >> these are separate. > One argument I can think of (not sure whether it's compelling) is the > size of the packages: sage is 48MB, sagenb is 18MB, extcode is 11M, all > in the top 10 of largest packages. So keeping a natural segmentation > might not be a bad idea.
Keeping sagenb separate makes sense, but keeping things separate based on size would suggest that sage.* should be split up. 11MB is nothing these days. > Also: your solution seems like a lot more work to implement. Perhaps. A lot less hassle once it's implemented though. - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
