On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2010-11-03 09:17, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> A lot less hassle once it's implemented though. > Which "hassle"? What's the problem with the current setup? (I agree > that scripts can be improved)
Nearly every time I've worked on either sage-scripts or extcode, I've had to submit corresponding patches to the sage library itself. I'd say this is more than double the work and confusion, and especially doesn't play well with switching between branches. Not to mention that working on spkgs outside the main library is less convenient. - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
