Hi Rob!

On 3 Aug., 19:04, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote:
> I read sage-devel and sage-support on the web.  No email.  So the
> amount of traffic is almost totally irrelevant to me.

Same for me.

> And I wouldn't mind learning more number
> theory incidentially.

So do I.

> I think of sage-edu as a safe place for *users* with a specialized
> interest and think it serves a valuable purpose as is.

Good point. Actually it could be that I missed the fact that there is
a difference between users and (potential) developers.

> For whatever
> reason, sage-release strikes me as good use of a standalone list,

+1, but perhaps the porting discussions should all take place
there, ...

> It wouldn't bother me if it morphed
> into a sage-build, but the previous point about sage-windows being
> useful in the future is well-taken.

... and indeed sage-windows reserved for a user (not developer) list.

Best regards,
Simon

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to