On Saturday, February 4, 2012 7:04:32 AM UTC+8, kcrisman wrote: > > > This might be a different problem. Shouldn't this give a syntax > error, folks? > > sage: h(x,y) = x+y > sage: h(3) > y + 3 > > ??? I thought the whole *point* of the h(x,y) notation was to specify > the order - but then you'd figure it would also specify the number of > entries. I guess this is a shorthand, perhaps, but then I don't know > how to get just h(,3) (which is naturally an error), which you'd want > by symmetry. I guess h(x,3) works, but then we should (perhaps?) > require h(3,y) as well? > > - kcrisman
I think h(3) should give syntax error. It doesn't make sense mathematically, and otherwise, it is ambiguous. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
