On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net>wrote:
> On 02/ 5/12 10:16 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > Never mind all that: the gsl implementation is not very good at all, >> whereas the libc implementation on my machine seems quite good. Old >> (libc): >> > > If that's the case, why not report the fact to the appropiate mailing list > - bug-gsl at gnu.org? > > dave > Well, I just sort of assume that the gsl developers have some idea how accurate their gamma function is and perhaps they consider their implementation just fine. It might not be a bug --- it might just be a design decision. Instead of "not very good" I should have said "not as accurate as eglibc". -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
