On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2012-02-11 17:54, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> I believe the license of Sage is very dubious at best > I will say it more strongly: Sage *is* violating the GPL by distributing > GPLv3-only packages (such as cvxopt) under a GPLv2+ licence.
1. Distributing GPLv3-only packages would not violate the GPL (as I explained elsewhere a few minutes ago). 2. cvxopt is *NOT* GPLv3-only licensed. The license is GPLv3+. -- William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
