On 6/20/12 2:33 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:42:40 AM UTC-7, jason wrote:
On 6/20/12 12:37 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:29:45 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> When you run 'make' in SAGE_ROOT, it builds sage and runs 'make
> doc-html'. I propose changing this so it instead runs 'make
> doc-html-jsmath', which uses jsMath to display math, rather than png
> images. In my experience, using jsMath is much faster, and the
> output looks good. (Individual users can make this the default by
> setting the environment variable SAGE_DOC_JSMATH to "yes", by the
way.)
>
>
> One advantage to *not* using jsMath: the docs using jsMath take
about
> 500 megabytes, compared to about 300 without jsMath. I haven't
checked
> with MathJax. (I still think it's worth using jsMath.)
Is that because a copy of jsmath is copied over to the output
directory?
I think so.
MathJax will be a lot smaller (if we don't use the image fonts).
Ah, you're right: switching from jsMath to MathJax changes the disk
space from 526M to 296M on my machine.
The mathjax directory should only be about 10M. Can you check its size
just to make sure?
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
