On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:49:52 PM UTC-7, jason wrote: > > On 6/20/12 2:33 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:42:40 AM UTC-7, jason wrote: > > > > On 6/20/12 12:37 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:29:45 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > > > When you run 'make' in SAGE_ROOT, it builds sage and runs 'make > > > doc-html'. I propose changing this so it instead runs 'make > > > doc-html-jsmath', which uses jsMath to display math, rather than > png > > > images. In my experience, using jsMath is much faster, and the > > > output looks good. (Individual users can make this the default by > > > setting the environment variable SAGE_DOC_JSMATH to "yes", by the > > way.) > > > > > > > > > One advantage to *not* using jsMath: the docs using jsMath take > > about > > > 500 megabytes, compared to about 300 without jsMath. I haven't > > checked > > > with MathJax. (I still think it's worth using jsMath.) > > > > Is that because a copy of jsmath is copied over to the output > > directory? > > > > > > I think so. > > > > MathJax will be a lot smaller (if we don't use the image fonts). > > > > > > Ah, you're right: switching from jsMath to MathJax changes the disk > > space from 526M to 296M on my machine. > > > The mathjax directory should only be about 10M. Can you check its size > just to make sure? >
I'm not sure which mathjax directory you mean. In doc/output/...., there are directories like doc/output/html/en/reference/_static/ containing a file "MathJax.js" and a directory "jax". Each of these _static directories (one for each component of the documentation, all identical, AFAIK) takes 5.5M on my machine. -- John -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
