Kwankyu Lee <[email protected]> writes: > Ah, so it is a bug. Thanks. I should not have included # in the patch file > name. > > On the other hand, it is strange that the patchbot tries to fetch an old patch > file "trac#12503.patch" rather than the new patch file named > "trac_12503_v3.patch" though I placed the comment "apply trac_12503_v3.patch" > to effect this.
Well, you changed the attachment list after placing the comment, which made the comment be considered outdated, I'm guessing. I added a new comment to the trac ticket, which should set the patchbot straight. What's more odd to me is that http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/12503/ doesn't seem to show any patchbot test run which tried to apply trac#12503.patch , but when you look at the logs of recent runs, you see that it is indeed trying to download trac#12503.patch . I submitted a pull request to Robert's github repo to try to fix the '#' issue, but the above makes me wonder whether there's another bug too... -Keshav ---- Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
