that should say "linux32 make seems to work ok" Vu
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:57 AM, tvn <[email protected]> wrote: > I think linux32 make -- though I see a bunch of errors on ImportError: No > module named conf etc but sage seems to be built fine. > > Thanks, > > > On Monday, July 23, 2012 2:40:19 PM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2012-07-23 18:54, tvn wrote: >> > I see -- no idea why though, perhaps to take advantage of some of the >> 64 >> > bit features from the hardware but also to maintain 32 bit >> compatibility >> > ? But anyway, such a situation exists -- is there a quick fix, such as >> > editing some FLAG, so Sage will build a 32 bit version ? >> >> Try running >> $ linux32 make >> >> instead of the usual "make". >> >> Obviously, you should do this starting from a clean Sage (don't continue >> your current build). >> > -- > -- > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > > > > -- -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
