> One can, of course, create cyclotomic > fields without such a choice of embedding by passing an extra argument > to the constructor. I think it makes a lot of sense to do that here as > well.
Can you be a little more specific here? How would you want the embedding being defined using an extra argument? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
