On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Christian Stump <christian.st...@gmail.com> wrote: >> One can, of course, create cyclotomic >> fields without such a choice of embedding by passing an extra argument >> to the constructor. I think it makes a lot of sense to do that here as >> well. > > Can you be a little more specific here? How would you want the > embedding being defined using an extra argument?
Good question, that depends on how it's implemented. Certainly None for no embedding makes sense, otherwise one could imagine accepting a map ZZ -> CC mapping generators to points on the unit circle (and it is up to the supplier of this map to ensure that this actually defines an embedding). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
