Op woensdag 16 januari 2013 11:24:19 UTC+1 schreef Volker Braun het volgende: > > On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:49:22 AM UTC, Timo Kluck wrote: > >> And then it would be nice if we'd distribute two tarballs for downstream >> to package, the one depending on the other: sage (or sagemath) which is the >> command line interface and the notebook, and something like python-sage (in >> the Debian naming convention) which is just the python library. >> > > Basically you are saying we should try to mimic the debian packaging > system. That doesn't make sense to me, the Sage tarball should be all of > the code in Sage and the distribution can split it up any way they want. > Thats how 99% of projects out there work. > > I'm actually in favor of keeping it both in a single repository! You're right that distributions may later split it in any way they see fit (like architecture-dependent stuff vs common stuff, etc). I only suggest having that repository include a way to make a tarball for just the (directory containing the) sage library. I see that mostly as a test of whether we're following the right conventions for python library packages.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
