On Monday, May 13, 2013 10:41:15 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 05/12/2013 03:27 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > Feel free to test or even use them, I can not guarantee anything is > > actualy working right (but at least sage computes 1+1 and returns 2). > > Note that for Cygwin you will still need to install Cygwin itself and > > the system-wide lapack packages; it might also need a rebase depending > > on what your Cygwin install already includes. > > How bad was the rebasing trouble while building Sage-on-Cygwin? > > And which version of GCC did you use and did you let Sage build its own > GCC (both for Solaris as well as Cygwin)? > For Solaris it build Sage's GCC (the only version available (by default) system-wide is 3.4.3 or something like that. I had to build with only one thread or it failed because of some make issues. This was not the case before but might be an NFS issue.
For Cygwin, i think it used the old gcc/g++/gfortran 4.5.3 from Cygwin. I used only one thread as well, but just because I needed some of my CPUs available, and I had to rebase 3 times. It first failed during mercurial, then during the Sage library and then during the doc. I also had some kind of troubles at the end of the doc (every time I tried), with gdb trying to get attched but it seems it was really after the doc was completely built. It did not happen as far as I can remember for 5.8 and for which I only had to rebase once when build the Sage library. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
