I'd say archiving the symlink is exactly what you'd want. If you use system libraries for compiling Sage then they become dependencies of the binary distribution, obviously.
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:08:20 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 06/11/2013 09:43 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > shouldn't the atlas spkg copy the static library instead of linking > > them, in order for sage -bdist to produce a working archive? > Can't we just declare SAGE_ATLAS_LIB to be fundamentally incompatible > with making a bdist? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
