Julien Puydt wrote:
Le 11/06/2013 11:33, Volker Braun a écrit :
I'd say archiving the symlink is exactly what you'd want. If you use
system libraries for compiling Sage then they become dependencies of the
binary distribution, obviously.
What would break if they were copied instead of linked?
Well, if you want the libraries to be part of the bdist (i.e., ship
them), why don't you just copy them into the Sage tree before running
'sage -bdist'?
As always, it would of course be nice to have a script doing that.
IMHO both options may make sense in some cases (i.e., shipping links to
*system* libraries, or including /some/ version).
-leif
The current answers look more like the usual "No, because it's different
from what we do now!" than like a technical discussion...
Snark on #sagemath
--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
