On Jul 5, 2013 7:41 AM, "Simon King" <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > > Hi Franco, > > On 2013-07-05, Franco Saliola <sali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I like the idea of being able to do > > > > categories.<tab> > > > > and seeing a list of the available categories (or some reasonable subset > > of). > > ... which would not require them being inserted into the global > namespace, AFAIK. > > > > For the record, I like the term magmatic algebras. It is not > > standard/common terminology and would certainly invite the user to look at > > the documentation to figure out what it is. > > When do you ever see the category of a parent P? In addition, there currently > is no non-associative algebra in Sage, hence, even if you do > P.category(), you would not see "Category of magmatic algebras".
Let me make my vote more precise: I like magmatic algebra as a temporary solution; otherwise I concur with Simon that we should redefine the current category Algebras. Franco -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
