The simpler C++ stuff is now well supported in Cython. Esoteric features 
will always cause troubles, but just using the std library is easy. Have a 
look at sage/tests/stl_vector.pyx for an example.





On Friday, September 27, 2013 5:00:07 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote:
>
> I thought that C was easyer to interface from cython than C++
>
> Anyways,  the solution of passing the length of the array and then copying 
> the values one by one doesn't sound bad to me.
>
> El jueves, 26 de septiembre de 2013 15:28:37 UTC+2, Volker Braun escribió:
>>
>> Numpy only does machine datatypes and python objects. You can do a numpy 
>> array of python wrappers of mpfr reals but that would not be a good 
>> solution here.
>>
>> If the library is under your own control, I would recommend to use C++ 
>> instead of C and then design the interface around std::vector<double>. This 
>> is easier than C arrays, and more easily wrapped in Cython as well.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:14:29 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2013-09-25, Volker Braun <vbrau...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>> > A pointer to a dynamically malloc'ed array doesn't know how long the 
>>> array 
>>> > is. Your C library function must returns its size, too. You can then 
>>> read 
>>> > it out one-by-one but you can't call list(c_array) since the latter 
>>> doesn't 
>>> > even know how long it is. 
>>>
>>> I read somewhere that it is convenient to use numpy arrays in such 
>>> a situation (they are stored intrenally as C arrays, and there are extra 
>>> Python hooks kept by numpy). 
>>> Not sure I can reproduce details here. 
>>>
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:02:55 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: 
>>> >> 
>>> >> I see, thanks. 
>>> >> 
>>> >> So, if i understand it correctly, i import my_c_function and then, to 
>>> call 
>>> >> it, i create the memory space for the array, copy the data into it 
>>> and pass 
>>> >> the array to the function. 
>>> >> 
>>> >> I guess the result will be another c array that i can access from 
>>> python 
>>> >> in a transparent way, right? 
>>> >> 
>>> >> I mean, if i write: 
>>> >> 
>>> >> res=my_c_function(c_values) 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Then i can just use 
>>> >> 
>>> >> list(res) 
>>> >> 
>>> >> to get a list of floats? 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> El miércoles, 25 de septiembre de 2013 13:22:51 UTC+2, Volker Braun 
>>> >> escribió: 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> Definitely use Cython. 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> For array of doubles, say, you just need a sage/libs/my_library.pyx 
>>> with 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> include "stdsage.pxi" 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> cdef extern from "my_library.h" 
>>> >>>     my_c_function(double*) 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> def my_python_function(values): 
>>> >>>     cdef double * c_values = <double*> 
>>> >>> sage_malloc(sizeof(double)*len(values)) 
>>> >>>     for i,v in enumerate(values): 
>>> >>>         c_values[i] = values[i] 
>>> >>>     my_c_function(c_values) 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:08:24 AM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: 
>>> >>>> 
>>> >>>> We are working on a c library to do homotoy continuation of 
>>> polynomial 
>>> >>>> roots using interval arithmetic. Our idea is to make a spkg with 
>>> it, and 
>>> >>>> write some functions in the sage library that would use it (in 
>>> particular, 
>>> >>>> to compute the fundamental group of the complement of an algebraic 
>>> curve). 
>>> >>>> so i have a question: 
>>> >>>> 
>>> >>>> how should we pass the data to the library, and retrieve it back? 
>>> Both 
>>> >>>> the input and output can be seen as an array of mpfr reals (or, 
>>> depending 
>>> >>>> on the version, floats or doubles). The length of the arrays is not 
>>> known a 
>>> >>>> priori. 
>>> >>>> 
>>> >>>> Which should be the best way to go? Write our interface in cython? 
>>> or 
>>> >>>> use ctypes? And in any case, is there some easy tutorial that we 
>>> could 
>>> >>>> follow? 
>>> >>>> 
>>> >>>> Thanks in advance. 
>>> >>>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> > 
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to