>
>
> >      > On the subject of the time taken to compile R: R itself compiles 
> in 
> >      > parallel relatively 
> >      > fast. 
> >     Really? I find that, when building sufficiently in parallel, R is 
> >     actually the *second slowest* package of all packages to compile, 
> after 
> >     ATLAS. 
> > 
> > I think Fran�ois meant the R core (written in C), not the bunch of R 
> > packages built afterward. 
> OK, perhaps that's right. 
>

Correct. We (long ago) used to not build these, but the functionality was 
so minimal compared to what people are used to that we now build them.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to