On Thursday, January 2, 2014 10:39:13 AM UTC-8, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > So I would propose that every *commit* that goes into Sage needs to be > positively reviewed.
In which case we'd want a lot more history discarding/rewriting to happen before a commit gets positive review. Wouldn't we be back at the hg workflow with patches, with patches replaced by git commits? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
