Ok, done. I wanted to proceed with #15285, but I don't know how. It seems that I must first merge #15107 into the develop branch, then merge that thing into this ticket, to see what this ticket does relative to the other one... right?
By the way, could the developer guide be updated (esp. the "git the hard way" section) to reflect the fact that we have the "develop" branch in addition to the "master" branch? I'm not quite sure how to synchronize that with the server. --Stefan. On Saturday, January 4, 2014 2:13:43 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Helloooooooooo !! > > > I did, briefly. I will have some time for this in the 2nd half of > January, after we are back to Oxford. > > Well, #15107 has been in needs_review for 4 months and I really wouldn't > mind if somebody reviewed it before the end of the month. > > By the way, I think we should use designs.ProjectivePlane as a name. > DesarguesianProjectivePlane is uselessly complicated, and we have currently > no way to return a "Projective Plane", even when one does not care which > kind of plane it may be. > > Anyway, quite soon we will have a "BalancedIncompleteBlockDesign" > function, and whike there may be many BIBD for a given set of parameters > that function will only return one... And we currently have a > designs.steiner_triple_system and designs.steiner_quadruple_system which > already behave that way. Sooooooooo well, I don't see anything wrong with a > designs.ProjectivePlaneDesign, and it is definitely much easier to find. > > Nathann > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
