2014-03-13 9:28 UTC+01:00, Marc Mezzarobba <[email protected]>: > Thierry wrote: >> - rename RR as RFF (for "real floating field"), so that this >> representation is not preferred than the others (especially RDF which >> is faster and allows using more libraries, with the same 53 bits of >> precision). The current name RR suggests it is the right default >> choice. > > Yes, there seems to be a lot of confusion due to the set of 53-bit > floating-point numbers being called "real field". See #11506 for a few > examples. >
These examples are great ! It would be more natural to have sage: Infinity in RFF and NaN in RFF # real floating field True sage: Infinity in RR and NaN in RR # real numbers False But the answer to "x in P" when x is an element and P a Parent is not quite clear to me. Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
