On Friday, April 4, 2014 11:19:11 AM UTC+1, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > existing one. However, in my case it would seem natural to improve the > basis > during the lifetime of an object.
IMHO that is always going to cause tears later on as the end-user isn't going to be aware that this modified all references to the lattice. The only downside of returning new objects is memory, and I'm pretty sure your problem runs of CPU before RAM. If you don't like that your lattice has a built-in basis then you could return new BasisOfLattice (say) objects. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
