Can you copy this post to sage-nt? John
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 6:57:56 AM UTC, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > Hey everyone, > I have proposed a change to #17578 > <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17578> which is backwards incompatible > in the sense that the returned value from __getitem__ is no longer one of > the indexing elements but a ManinSymbol instance whose parent is the > ManinSymbolList. In particular, there will be no deprecation period or > warning printed. The old behavior will still be accessible via the m.method > symbol_list()[i] (instead of m[i]). > > We need to change ManinSymbolList to a Parent whose elements are > ManinSymbol for the much desired #10513 > <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10513>. As part of a parent in > FiniteEnumeratedSets, this change would make ManinSymbolList consistent > with other such parents. > > If there are any objections or questions, please state them. We would > also appreciate someone to review my changes, especially someone who uses > or has developed the Manin symbols code (my apologies Peter if you have). > > Best, > Travis > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
