Hi Marc, Le samedi 28 février 2015 17:07:33 UTC+1, Marc Mezzarobba a écrit :
> > There are *tons* of modules missing from the reference manual, some > obsolete, some still in pre-sphinx style or with rst syntax errors, some > whose user documentation in fact appears in another module, and many > apparently just forgotten. > OK I see... > > A few weeks ago I started systematically adding those that didn't look > like they were intentionally omitted, with minimal fixes to the broken > docstrings so that the manual still builds (but not necessarily that the > new chapters look good). > > Very good! Then clearly the ticket #17876 is irrelevant. How can we suppress it ? (Maybe mark it as duplicate once your ticket is opened ?) If someone wants to help, see u/mmezzarobba/wip/refman on trac (already > bitrotten I'm sure, but probably still useful). > > In terms of included modules I'm somewhere in sage/modular (in > alphabetical order), with lots of sphinx errors remaining in the newly > included ones. In most cases I added the missing modules to the > corresponding tables of contents in more or less random order, the idea > being to do a second pass to rationalize the structure once we have a > clearer idea of the full list of modules. > > Good luck! (this seems an impressive amount of work). Best regards, Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
