Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > There are *tons* of modules missing from the reference manual, some > obsolete, some still in pre-sphinx style or with rst syntax errors, > some whose user documentation in fact appears in another module, and > many apparently just forgotten. > > A few weeks ago I started systematically adding those that didn't look > like they were intentionally omitted, with minimal fixes to the broken > docstrings so that the manual still builds (but not necessarily that > the new chapters look good). [...] > In most cases I added the missing modules to the > corresponding tables of contents in more or less random order, the > idea being to do a second pass to rationalize the structure once we > have a clearer idea of the full list of modules.
Second part: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18161 # repl, needs review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18162 # plot, needs review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18163 # modules, needs review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18164 # coding, thanks Frédéric for the review! http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18165 # geometry, thanks Frédéric & Travis for the review! http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18166 # calculus, needs review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18167 # schemes, needs review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18168 # quadratic_forms, needs review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18169 # rings, needs review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18170 # others, needs review Also http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17932 from the first part still needs review. -- Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
