Hi John, On 2015-04-03, John Cremona <[email protected]> wrote: >> To be more accurate, the ticket at 18120 removes the 'optional' mention next >> to the 'SEEALSO' section, thus implying that it is mandatory for all >> functions to have a 'SEEALSO' section. > > Being mandatory seems to me to be going too far,
I think Nathann did not suggest to make it explicitly mandatory, but only to remove the explicit labelling as being "optional". So, it is implied that one should use SEEALSO, but it is not strictly required. Marking it as "highly recommended", however, seems fine to me. In any case, what really matters is whether referees would set a ticket to "needs work" if a SEEALSO is missing. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
