Am 2015-04-03 um 14:10 schrieb Simon King: >> Being mandatory seems to me to be going too far, > > I think Nathann did not suggest to make it explicitly mandatory, but > only to remove the explicit labelling as being "optional". So, it is > implied that one should use SEEALSO, but it is not strictly required. > > Marking it as "highly recommended", however, seems fine to me. In any > case, what really matters is whether referees would set a ticket to > "needs work" if a SEEALSO is missing.
The intention of #18120 is to remove this "optional", but not making it explicitly manadatory. "highly recommended" sounds like a good phrase. Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
