kcrisman wrote: > Occasionally people do; I occasionally cull (i) or transfer > them/report > upstream to the github sagenb site, for instance. It's just that > people have other things to work on; in that sense, "triage" is > happening continuously.
Sure. I mentioned these specific areas because the number of old tickets in these areas is particularly large, and in many cases I can't tell by myself if the ticket is still relevant or not. > Secondly, it's probably better to keep them around (unless server > space is an issue! j/k) in case there is something more subtle > happening than one thinks. For example, (iii) tickets may have useful > information on porting in general, even if they may not be worked on > regularly. Yes, I'm certainly not suggesting to close them en masse. But keeping the outdated ones open also makes old problems that really need work harder to find. -- Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
