On Monday, 15 June 2015 00:57:44 UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > All right. I recompiled Sage without chomp. Now, beyond the binary tree > issues with bliss (#18698), I have failing doctests related to > gap_database (all of them are marked with #option - database_gap) in > > - sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup_named.py > - sage/tests/gap_packages.py > - sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup_named.py > > Looks to a failure similar to the one reported by > Emanuel Charpentier on sage-release. The gap packages fail to be imported > > sage: import sage.tests.gap_packages > sage: sage.tests.gap_packages.test_packages(['atlasrep']) > Status Package GAP Output > +---------+----------+------------+ > Failure atlasrep fail > sage: sage.tests.gap_packages.test_packages(['tomlib']) > Status Package GAP Output > +---------+---------+------------+ > Failure tomlib fail > > for these you (also) need database_gap
The error message in sage: gap.load_package("tomlib") --------------------------------------------------------------------------- RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipython-input-1-cc487c826f42> in <module>() ----> 1 gap.load_package("tomlib") /home/dima/software/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/interfaces/gap.pyc in load_package(self, pkg, verbose) 504 if x == 'fail': 505 raise RuntimeError("Error loading Gap package "+str(pkg)+". "+ --> 506 "You may want to install the gap_packages SPKG.") 507 508 def eval(self, x, newlines=False, strip=True, split_lines=True, **kwds): RuntimeError: Error loading Gap package tomlib. You may want to install the gap_packages SPKG. After installing database_gap, atlasrep loads, too Let me see how to fix this. Vincent > > On 14/06/15 10:32, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > according to #16364, chomp could lead to this kind of things. But it is > not > > in your list !! > > > > Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:29:33 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > >> > >> For binary trees, I have made http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18698 > that > >> needs review. > >> > >> Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:19:22 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > >>> > >>> Indeed, the failure for binary trees should come from canonical > labeling. > >>> It would be enough to > >>> change the doctest so that they are no longer sensitive to that. > >>> > >>> I am no longer that sure that TOPCOM is the other problem. What other > >>> package is delaing with homology ? chomp ? > >>> > >>> Frederic > >>> > >>> Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:09:23 UTC+2, Nathann Cohen a écrit : > >>>> > >>>>> I would suspect that topcom should be responsible for the homology > >>>> errors. > >>>>> > >>>>> No idea for what happens to binary trees. They seem to be reversed > >>>> (left-right symmetry ?) > >>>> > >>>> That could be 'bliss'. It becomes the default algorithm to compute > >>>> automorphism groups of graphs and canonical representatives. Those > >>>> canonical representatives will be different from the previous ones, > >>>> though. > >>>> > >>>> Nathann > >>>> > >>> > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.