this is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18724
Needs review!
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 08:56:53 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, 15 June 2015 00:57:44 UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote:
>>
>> All right. I recompiled Sage without chomp. Now, beyond the binary tree
>> issues with bliss (#18698), I have failing doctests related to
>> gap_database (all of them are marked with #option - database_gap) in
>>
>> - sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup_named.py
>> - sage/tests/gap_packages.py
>> - sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup_named.py
>>
>> Looks to a failure similar to the one reported by
>> Emanuel Charpentier on sage-release. The gap packages fail to be imported
>>
>> sage: import sage.tests.gap_packages
>> sage: sage.tests.gap_packages.test_packages(['atlasrep'])
>> Status Package GAP Output
>> +---------+----------+------------+
>> Failure atlasrep fail
>> sage: sage.tests.gap_packages.test_packages(['tomlib'])
>> Status Package GAP Output
>> +---------+---------+------------+
>> Failure tomlib fail
>>
>>
> for these you (also) need database_gap
>
> The error message in
> sage: gap.load_package("tomlib")
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last)
> <ipython-input-1-cc487c826f42> in <module>()
> ----> 1 gap.load_package("tomlib")
>
> /home/dima/software/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/interfaces/gap.pyc
>
> in load_package(self, pkg, verbose)
> 504 if x == 'fail':
> 505 raise RuntimeError("Error loading Gap package
> "+str(pkg)+". "+
> --> 506 "You may want to install the
> gap_packages SPKG.")
> 507
> 508 def eval(self, x, newlines=False, strip=True,
> split_lines=True, **kwds):
>
> RuntimeError: Error loading Gap package tomlib. You may want to install
> the gap_packages SPKG.
>
>
> After installing database_gap, atlasrep loads, too
>
> Let me see how to fix this.
>
>
> Vincent
>>
>> On 14/06/15 10:32, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>> > according to #16364, chomp could lead to this kind of things. But it is
>> not
>> > in your list !!
>> >
>> > Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:29:33 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> For binary trees, I have made http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18698
>> that
>> >> needs review.
>> >>
>> >> Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:19:22 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>> Indeed, the failure for binary trees should come from canonical
>> labeling.
>> >>> It would be enough to
>> >>> change the doctest so that they are no longer sensitive to that.
>> >>>
>> >>> I am no longer that sure that TOPCOM is the other problem. What other
>> >>> package is delaing with homology ? chomp ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Frederic
>> >>>
>> >>> Le dimanche 14 juin 2015 10:09:23 UTC+2, Nathann Cohen a écrit :
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I would suspect that topcom should be responsible for the homology
>> >>>> errors.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> No idea for what happens to binary trees. They seem to be reversed
>> >>>> (left-right symmetry ?)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> That could be 'bliss'. It becomes the default algorithm to compute
>> >>>> automorphism groups of graphs and canonical representatives. Those
>> >>>> canonical representatives will be different from the previous ones,
>> >>>> though.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nathann
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
